That ends today. So please feel free to skip over any of my posts that are not of interest ... I will give them an index label "Politics" so you can be forewarned. And if you are on the Kindred Spirits list and would prefer not to be associated with my particular brand of politics, just let me know and I'll remove your link from the list.
Onward.
Inspired by Dee Mallon over at her newly retitled blog Pattern and Outrage (https://deemallon.wordpress.com/2017/01/31/h-is-for-humor-c-is-for-courage) and Mo's comment citing this article https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/how-our-likes-helped-trump-win, I decided to put together a series of articles that have stuck in my mind over the past several months. You will note that some are mainstream media and some are not. Where possible, I've tried to corroborate facts, but the conclusions at the end are my own.
The first warning bell went off in my head when I read this
New York Times op-ed piece in November (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/opinion/the-secret-agenda-of-a-facebook-quiz.html).
In short, it pointed out how the Trump campaign used Facebook to win the election. This in particular was chilling: "One recent advertising product on Facebook is the so-called
“dark post”: a newsfeed message seen by no one aside from the users being
targeted. With the help of Cambridge Analytica, Mr. Trump’s digital team used
dark posts to serve different ads to different potential voters, aiming to push
the exact right buttons for the exact right people at the exact right times.”
More recently,
an Internet meme purportedly by Heather Richardson at Boston College started making the
rounds. I was able to find a verified version of it here: http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2017/01/31/americans-can-turn-tables-steve-bannons-shock-event.
She warned that, like a magician’s sleight of hand, what you are looking at in
terms of political activity such as the Immigration Ban, may actually be cover for another, more sinister event.
Which brings me to this article in the Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-fires-ice-acting-director_us_589004a0e4b02772c4e8e7db,
which actually appeared before many in the more traditional media picked it up https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/31/us/politics/thomas-homan-immigration-and-customs-enforcement.html?_r=0.
Thomas Homan has been appointed the new head of ICE, which is responsible for
deportation. This is what the Washington Post had to say about him in April 2016
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/04/25/meet-the-man-the-white-house-has-honored-for-deporting-illegal-immigrants/?utm_term=.e61a79da19c3.
Here’s what I’m getting at. I’m pretty sure that advisors
such as Steve Bannon have more on their minds than winning an election. For instance, all that psychometric data collected by Cambridge Analytica in 2016 could
now be used to send “dark posts” to individuals who would be inclined to identify people they think might be illegal immigrants. Which is not to say that those people
actually are illegal, as the recent chaos at national airports over the
Executive Order on immigration clearly demonstrated. But even if purported "illegals" were eventually cleared, their lives would be significantly disrupted.
Is this a wild-eyed conspiracy theory? Or have I connected
some dots that need to be explored?
I fear that those halcyon days of the FBI having to go through legal protocols to obtain personal data are long gone. Because if it is indeed true that the Cambridge Analytica data will be exploited by the Trump administration, what other nefarious ends might be realized? And how would we ever know?
